[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f05cd38-c576-0ded-81b6-fe0b49a5059e@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 18:40:25 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for clang 14.0.0+
On 8/17/21 18:23, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>>>> # Warn about unmarked fall-throughs in switch statement.
>>>> # Clang prior to 14.0.0 warned on unreachable fallthroughs with
>>>> # -Wimplicit-fallthrough, which is unacceptable due to IS_ENABLED().
>>>> # https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
>>>> ifeq ($(firstword $(sort $(CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION) 140000)),140000)
>>>> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wimplicit-fallthrough
>>>> endif
>
> Very clever and nifty trick! I have verified that it works for clang 13 and 14 along with a theoretical clang 15. Gustavo, feel free to stick a
>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
>
> if you so desire.
Yep; I just tested it locally with clang 13 and 14, too.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists