linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH v2 44/63] mac80211: Use memset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Aug 2021 10:06:51 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 44/63] mac80211: Use memset_after() to clear tx status

On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 09:08 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 23:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > 
> > @@ -275,12 +275,11 @@ static void carl9170_tx_release(struct kref *ref)
> >  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ar))
> >  		return;
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -	BUILD_BUG_ON(
> > -	    offsetof(struct ieee80211_tx_info, status.ack_signal) != 20);
> > -
> > -	memset(&txinfo->status.ack_signal, 0,
> > -	       sizeof(struct ieee80211_tx_info) -
> > -	       offsetof(struct ieee80211_tx_info, status.ack_signal));
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Should this call ieee80211_tx_info_clear_status() instead of clearing
> > +	 * manually? txinfo->status.rates do not seem to be used here.
> > +	 */
> 
> Since you insist, I went digging :)
> 
> It should not, carl9170_tx_fill_rateinfo() has filled the rate
> information before we get to this point.

Otherwise, looks fine, FWIW.

Are you going to apply all of these together somewhere? I (we) can't,
since memset_after() doesn't exist yet.

johannes