linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add __alloc_size() for better bounds checking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:34:01 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.de>
Cc:     Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add __alloc_size() for better bounds checking

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 12:01:42PM +0200, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2021, Daniel Micay wrote:
> 
> > For example, it will know that kmalloc(n) returns either NULL or an
> > allocation of size n. A simple sample program with calloc in
> > userspace:
> >
> >     #include <stdlib.h>
> >     #include <stdio.h>
> >
> >     int main(void) {
> >         char *p = calloc(64, 1);
> >         if (!p) {
> >             return 1;
> >         }
> >         printf("%zu\n", __builtin_object_size(p, 1));
> >         return 0;
> >     }
> >
> > It will also detect an out-of-bounds access via the allocation with
> > -fsanitize=object-size including with a runtime value as the index.
> >
> > It's not as useful as it should be yet because __builtin_object_size
> > must return a compile-time constant. Clang has a new
> > __builtin_dynamic_object_size that's allowed to return a value that's
> > not a compile-time constant so it can work for kmalloc(n) where n is a
> > runtime value. It might not be quite ready for use yet but it should
> > be able to make it a lot more useful. GCC also seems open to adding it
> > too.
> 
> The other complication with kmalloc etc is that the slab allocators may
> decided to allocate more bytes than needed because it does not support
> that particular allocation size. Some functions check the allocated true
> size and make use of that. See ksize().

Yup, this is known. For the current iteration, this doesn't pose a
problem since the compile-time checking has very limited scope.

-- 
Kees Cook