lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:59:09 -0700
From:   Brendan Higgins <>
To:     Linus Torvalds <>
Cc:     Kees Cook <>, Shuah Khan <>,
        David Gow <>, Arnd Bergmann <>,
        Rafael Wysocki <>,
        Jonathan Cameron <>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <>,
        Ulf Hansson <>,,,
        Mika Westerberg <>,, Masahiro Yamada <>,
        Michal Marek <>,
        Nick Desaulniers <>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        KUnit Development <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,,,,,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed: build kunit tests without
 structleak plugin

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:40 AM Linus Torvalds
<> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 8:57 AM Kees Cook <> wrote:
> >
> > This isn't a stand-alone test object, so I'm less excited about
> > disabling STRUCTLEAK here.
> Yeah, please don't do this for things that aren't pure tests. You're
> now disabling security measures (even if I hate the gcc plugins and
> hope they will go away).

Oh, whoops, yeah, I shouldn't do that. I am just going to drop this
patch entirely, as I wasn't able to reproduce the stack frame size
issue on qemu anyway (as I mentioned on the cover letter).

Thanks for catching this.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists