[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202110021441.C70D775A61@keescook>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 14:42:54 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] docs: Explain the desired position of function
attributes
On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 06:27:02PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 5:22 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> >
> > If automated scripts exist to change all the code to that new
> > 'one true way', it wouldn't be applied.
>
> I think nobody is saying we should reformat all code at once, just
> that agreeing on a given style allows us to eventually automate it (it
> also makes humans more likely to be consistent).
I just want to know what style to use to not have it NAKed by Linus. ;)
But yeah, it might be nice to do style checking against the kernel some
day. We have a lot of weird stuff in here, though! *slaps roof of kernel*
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists