[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202110060930.84D8EC6@keescook>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 09:31:24 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: task_struct: Fill unconditional hole induced by
sched_entity
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 11:27:03AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 09:48:51PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 07:54:50PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > With struct sched_entity before the other sched entities, its alignment
> > > won't induce a struct hole. This saves 64 bytes in defconfig task_struct:
> >
> > Friendly ping. Can someone snag this for -tip please?
>
> Hurpmf... if only we had like perf driven pahole output :/
Normally I wouldn't even make suggestions in task_struct given the high
variability due to CONFIG options, but this case was pretty universal.
> Picked it up, we'll see what if anything hurts.
Thanks! *fingers crossed*
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists