[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWGQckkJuKB4yAfg@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 15:52:02 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>, jannh@...gle.com,
vcaputo@...garu.com, mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
amistry@...gle.com, Kenta.Tada@...y.com, legion@...nel.org,
michael.weiss@...ec.fraunhofer.de, mhocko@...e.com, deller@....de,
zhengqi.arch@...edance.com, me@...in.cc, tycho@...ho.pizza,
tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
metze@...ba.org, laijs@...ux.alibaba.com, luto@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
ohoono.kwon@...sung.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com,
yifeifz2@...inois.edu, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
vgupta@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk, will@...nel.org,
guoren@...nel.org, bcain@...eaurora.org, monstr@...str.eu,
tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, nickhu@...estech.com,
jonas@...thpole.se, mpe@...erman.id.au, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp, davem@...emloft.net,
chris@...kel.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: proc: Make sure wchan works when it exists
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 04:55:04PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> This makes sure that wchan contains a sensible symbol when a process is
> blocked.
> Specifically this calls the sleep() syscall, and expects the
> architecture to have called schedule() from a function that has "sleep"
> somewhere in its name.
This exposes internal kernel symbol to userspace.
Why would want to test that?
Doing s/sleep/SLEEP/g doesn't change kernel but now the test is broken.
> For example, on the architectures I tested
> (x86_64, arm64, arm, mips, and powerpc) this is "hrtimer_nanosleep":
> +/*
> + * Make sure that wchan returns a reasonable symbol when blocked.
> + */
Test should be "contains C identifier" then?
> +int main(void)
> +{
> + char buf[64];
> + pid_t child;
> + int sync[2], fd;
> +
> + if (pipe(sync) < 0)
> + perror_exit("pipe");
> +
> + child = fork();
> + if (child < 0)
> + perror_exit("fork");
> + if (child == 0) {
> + /* Child */
> + if (close(sync[0]) < 0)
> + perror_exit("child close sync[0]");
> + if (close(sync[1]) < 0)
> + perror_exit("child close sync[1]");
Redundant close().
> + sleep(10);
> + _exit(0);
> + }
> + /* Parent */
> + if (close(sync[1]) < 0)
> + perror_exit("parent close sync[1]");
Redundant close().
> + if (read(sync[0], buf, 1) != 0)
> + perror_exit("parent read sync[0]");
Racy if child is scheduled out after first close in the child.
> + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "/proc/%d/wchan", child);
> + fd = open(buf, O_RDONLY);
> + if (fd < 0) {
> + if (errno == ENOENT)
> + return 4;
> + perror_exit(buf);
> + }
> +
> + memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
> + if (read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1) < 1)
> + perror_exit(buf);
> + if (strstr(buf, "sleep") == NULL) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "FAIL: did not find 'sleep' in wchan '%s'\n", buf);
> + return 1;
> + }
> + printf("ok: found 'sleep' in wchan '%s'\n", buf);
> +
> + if (kill(child, SIGKILL) < 0)
> + perror_exit("kill");
> + if (waitpid(child, NULL, 0) != child) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "waitpid: got the wrong child!?\n");
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists