[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211014145211.573579e6@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:52:11 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/15] x86: Use an opaque type for functions not
callable from C
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 11:47:01 -0700
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 07:31:26PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:07:57AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Looking at the changelog, DECLARE_ASM_FUNC_SYMBOL, makes a lot more
> > sense to me even if it doesn't specify the aspect that it is not called
> > by C but who cares - it is generic enough.
>
> Around we go. :) Josh[1] and Steven[2] explicitly disagreed with
> that name, leading to the current name[3]. Do you want it to be
> DECLARE_ASM_FUNC_SYMBOL() over those objections?
Just note, that I was fine with the original name, but was against the
version Josh suggested ;-)
>
> I'd really like to finish this shed -- I need to take the bikes in from
> the rain. :P
Back to black it is!
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists