linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] selftests: proc: Make sure wchan works when it exists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202110211008.CC8B26A@keescook>
Date:   Thu, 21 Oct 2021 10:09:33 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>, jannh@...gle.com,
        vcaputo@...garu.com, mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
        bristot@...hat.com, christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
        amistry@...gle.com, Kenta.Tada@...y.com, legion@...nel.org,
        michael.weiss@...ec.fraunhofer.de, mhocko@...e.com, deller@....de,
        zhengqi.arch@...edance.com, me@...in.cc, tycho@...ho.pizza,
        tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
        metze@...ba.org, laijs@...ux.alibaba.com, luto@...nel.org,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        ohoono.kwon@...sung.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com,
        yifeifz2@...inois.edu, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        vgupta@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk, will@...nel.org,
        guoren@...nel.org, bcain@...eaurora.org, monstr@...str.eu,
        tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, nickhu@...estech.com,
        jonas@...thpole.se, mpe@...erman.id.au, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
        hca@...ux.ibm.com, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp, davem@...emloft.net,
        chris@...kel.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: proc: Make sure wchan works when it exists

On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 04:55:04PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> This makes sure that wchan contains a sensible symbol when a process is
> blocked. Specifically this calls the sleep() syscall, and expects the
> architecture to have called schedule() from a function that has "sleep"
> somewhere in its name. For example, on the architectures I tested
> (x86_64, arm64, arm, mips, and powerpc) this is "hrtimer_nanosleep":
> 
> $ tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-pid-wchan
> ok: found 'sleep' in wchan 'hrtimer_nanosleep'
> 
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
> Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

Friendly ping.

> ---
> Hi Peter,
> 
> Can you add this to the wchan series, please? This should help wchan from
> regressing in the future, and allow us to notice if the depth accidentally
> changes, like Mark saw.
> ---

I'd like to make sure we have a regression test for this. Will you add
this to the wchan series please?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook