[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15e7ed54-2a4d-3e96-7181-d15b65ff5138@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 18:50:33 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] iommu/dma: Use kvcalloc() instead of kvzalloc()
On 2021-09-28 23:22, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Use 2-factor argument form kvcalloc() instead of kvzalloc().
If we have a thing for that now, then sure, why not. FWIW this can't
ever overflow due to where "count" comes from, but it has no reason to
be special.
Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index 896bea04c347..18c6edbe5fbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static struct page **__iommu_dma_alloc_pages(struct device *dev,
> if (!order_mask)
> return NULL;
>
> - pages = kvzalloc(count * sizeof(*pages), GFP_KERNEL);
> + pages = kvcalloc(count, sizeof(*pages), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!pages)
> return NULL;
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists