[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202110210140.D42185CAC@keescook>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 01:41:31 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] compiler-gcc.h: Define __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__ under
hwaddress sanitizer
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 12:45:02AM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:00 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > I'm intending to take this via my overflow series, since that is what introduces
> > the compile-test regression tests (which found this legitimate bug). :)
>
> Not sure if there is a particular reason I was in the `To` field
> (please let me know if so), but the patch sounds good to me!
Well, I didn't want the "To" to be me, and IIRC, you had sent a review
for Arnd's prior version.
> Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Thanks!
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists