linux-hardening - Re: selftests: seccomp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87v9193x4j.fsf@disp2133>
Date:   Wed, 03 Nov 2021 13:35:56 -0500
From:   ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@...onical.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: selftests: seccomp_bpf failure on 5.15

Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:

> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 01:22:19PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:
>> 
>> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 05:06:53PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:
>> >> 
>> >> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:26:26PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> Is it a problem that the debugger can see the signal if the process does
>> >> not?
>> >
>> > Right, I'm trying to understand that too. However, my neighbor just lost
>> > power. :|
>> >
>> > What I was in the middle of checking was what ptrace "sees" going
>> > through a fatal SIGSYS; my initial debugging attempts were weird.
>> 
>> Kees have you regained power and had a chance to see my SA_IMMUTABLE
>> patch?
>
> Apologies; I got busy with other stuff, but I've tested this now. It's
> happy and I see the expected behaviors again. Note that I used the patch
> with this change:
>
> -#define SA_IMMUTABLE           0x008000000
> +#define SA_IMMUTABLE           0x00800000
>
> Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

Thanks.

And I see you have written a test as well that should keep
this kind of bug from happening again.

Eric