[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202111171049.3F9C5F1@keescook>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 10:51:30 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@...onical.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Robert O'Callahan <rocallahan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] 5.16rc1: SA_IMMUTABLE breaks debuggers
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 10:47:13AM -0800, Kyle Huey wrote:
> rr, a userspace record and replay debugger[0], is completely broken on
> 5.16rc1. I bisected this to 00b06da29cf9dc633cdba87acd3f57f4df3fd5c7.
>
> That patch makes two changes, it blocks sigaction from changing signal
> handlers once the kernel has decided to force the program to take a
> signal and it also stops notifying ptracers of the signal in the same
> circumstances. The latter behavior is just wrong. There's no reason
> that ptrace should not be able to observe and even change
> (non-SIGKILL) forced signals. It should be reverted.
>
> This behavior change is also observable in gdb. If you take a program
> that sets SIGSYS to SIG_IGN and then raises a SIGSYS via
> SECCOMP_RET_TRAP and run it under gdb on a good kernel gdb will stop
> when the SIGSYS is raised, let you inspect program state, etc. After
> the SA_IMMUTABLE change gdb won't stop until the program has already
> died of SIGSYS.
Ah, hm, this was trying to fix the case where a program trips
SECCOMP_RET_KILL (which is a "fatal SIGSYS"), and had been unobservable
before. I guess the fix was too broad...
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists