lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 22:49:42 +0100 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: Use memset_startat() to zero struct nf_conn On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 12:31:13PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time > field bounds checking for memset(), avoid intentionally writing across > neighboring fields. > > Use memset_startat() to avoid confusing memset() about writing beyond > the target struct member. Applied to nf-next, thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists