linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH v8 05/14] x86: conditionally place regular ASM functions into separate sections

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMe9rOrVnb3oVRn5igjwimBbE6QH-v0tuHk-kjRz7osbJMQd1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:51:04 -0800
From:   "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Bruce Schlobohm <bruce.schlobohm@...el.com>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Marios Pomonis <pomonis@...gle.com>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/14] x86: conditionally place regular ASM functions
 into separate sections

On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 8:34 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 03:10:51PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 10:44:10 +0100
> >
> > > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 11:32:05PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > > > Use the newly introduces macros to create unique separate sections
> > > > for (almost) every "regular" ASM function (i.e. for those which
> > > > aren't explicitly put into a specific one).
> > > > There should be no leftovers as input .text will be size-asserted
> > > > in the LD script generated for FG-KASLR.
> > >
> > > *groan*...
> > >
> > > Please, can't we do something like:
> > >
> > > #define SYM_PUSH_SECTION(name)      \
> > > .if section == .text                \
> > > .push_section .text.##name  \
> > > .else                               \
> > > .push_section .text         \
> > > .endif
> > >
> > > #define SYM_POP_SECTION()   \
> > > .pop_section
> > >
> > > and wrap that inside the existing SYM_FUNC_START*() SYM_FUNC_END()
> > > macros.
> >
> > Ah I see. I asked about this in my previous mail and you replied
> > already (: Cool stuff, I'll use it, it simplifies things a lot.
>
> Note, I've no idea if it works. GAS and me aren't really on speaking
> terms. It would be my luck for that to be totally impossible, hjl?

What exactly do you want assembler to do?

-- 
H.J.