lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 14:07:40 +0100 (CET) From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz> To: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com> cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Bruce Schlobohm <bruce.schlobohm@...el.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@...tuozzo.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Marios Pomonis <pomonis@...gle.com>, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev, stable@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/15] modpost: fix removing numeric suffixes On Thu, 23 Dec 2021, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > For now, that condition from remove_dot(): > > if (m && (s[n + m] == '.' || s[n + m] == 0)) > > which was designed to test if it's a dot or a \0 after the suffix > is never satisfied. > This is due to that s[n + m] always points to the last digit of a > numeric suffix, not on the symbol next to it: > > param_set_uint.0, s[n + m] is '0', s[n + m + 1] is '\0' > > So it's off by one and was like that since 2014. > > `-z uniq-symbol` linker flag which we are planning to use to `-z unique-symbol` Miroslav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists