linux-hardening - [PATCH] kasan: test: fix compatibility with FORTIFY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:07:44 +0100
From:   Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To:     elver@...gle.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] kasan: test: fix compatibility with FORTIFY_SOURCE

With CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled, string functions will also perform
dynamic checks using __builtin_object_size(ptr), which when failed will
panic the kernel.

Because the KASAN test deliberately performs out-of-bounds operations,
the kernel panics with FORITY_SOURCE, for example:

 | kernel BUG at lib/string_helpers.c:910!
 | invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
 | CPU: 1 PID: 137 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G    B             5.16.0-rc3+ #3
 | Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
 | RIP: 0010:fortify_panic+0x19/0x1b
 | ...
 | Call Trace:
 |  <TASK>
 |  kmalloc_oob_in_memset.cold+0x16/0x16
 |  ...

Fix it by also hiding `ptr` from the optimizer, which will ensure that
__builtin_object_size() does not return a valid size, preventing
fortified string functions from panicking.

Reported-by: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
---
 lib/test_kasan.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/test_kasan.c b/lib/test_kasan.c
index 847cdbefab46..26a5c9007653 100644
--- a/lib/test_kasan.c
+++ b/lib/test_kasan.c
@@ -492,6 +492,7 @@ static void kmalloc_oob_in_memset(struct kunit *test)
 	ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
+	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
 	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
 				memset(ptr, 0, size + KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE));
@@ -515,6 +516,7 @@ static void kmalloc_memmove_negative_size(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
 	memset((char *)ptr, 0, 64);
+	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
 	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(invalid_size);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
 		memmove((char *)ptr, (char *)ptr + 4, invalid_size));
@@ -531,6 +533,7 @@ static void kmalloc_memmove_invalid_size(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
 	memset((char *)ptr, 0, 64);
+	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
 		memmove((char *)ptr, (char *)ptr + 4, invalid_size));
 	kfree(ptr);
@@ -893,6 +896,7 @@ static void kasan_memchr(struct kunit *test)
 	ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
+	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
 	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
 		kasan_ptr_result = memchr(ptr, '1', size + 1));
@@ -919,6 +923,7 @@ static void kasan_memcmp(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 	memset(arr, 0, sizeof(arr));
 
+	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
 	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
 		kasan_int_result = memcmp(ptr, arr, size+1));
-- 
2.35.0.rc0.227.g00780c9af4-goog