[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220131204357.1133674-1-keescook@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:43:57 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Martin Uecker <Martin.Uecker@....uni-goettingen.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] linux/const.h: Explain how __is_constexpr() works
The __is_constexpr() macro is dark magic. Shed some light on it with
a comment to explain how and why it works.
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Martin Uecker <Martin.Uecker@....uni-goettingen.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
Jon, since this is pure comment, do you want to take it through the docs tree?
---
include/linux/const.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/const.h b/include/linux/const.h
index 435ddd72d2c4..7122d6a1f8ce 100644
--- a/include/linux/const.h
+++ b/include/linux/const.h
@@ -7,6 +7,30 @@
* This returns a constant expression while determining if an argument is
* a constant expression, most importantly without evaluating the argument.
* Glory to Martin Uecker <Martin.Uecker@....uni-goettingen.de>
+ *
+ * Details:
+ * - sizeof() is an integer constant expression, and does not evaluate the
+ * value of its operand; it only examines the type of its operand.
+ * - The results of comparing two integer constant expressions is also
+ * an integer constant expression.
+ * - The use of literal "8" is to avoid warnings about unaligned pointers;
+ * these could otherwise just be "1"s.
+ * - (long)(x) is used to avoid warnings about 64-bit types on 32-bit
+ * architectures.
+ * - The C standard defines an "integer constant expression" as different
+ * from a "null pointer constant" (an integer constant 0 pointer).
+ * - The conditional operator ("... ? ... : ...") returns the type of the
+ * operand that isn't a null pointer constant. This behavior is the
+ * central mechanism of the macro.
+ * - If (x) is an integer constant expression, then the "* 0l" resolves it
+ * into a null pointer constant, which forces the conditional operator
+ * to return the type of the last operand: "(int *)".
+ * - If (x) is not an integer constant expression, then the type of the
+ * conditional operator is from the first operand: "(void *)".
+ * - sizeof(int) == 4 and sizeof(void) == 1.
+ * - The ultimate comparison to "sizeof(int)" chooses between either:
+ * sizeof(*((int *) (8)) == sizeof(int) (x was a constant expression)
+ * sizeof(*((void *)(8)) == sizeof(void) (x was not a constant expression)
*/
#define __is_constexpr(x) \
(sizeof(int) == sizeof(*(8 ? ((void *)((long)(x) * 0l)) : (int *)8)))
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists