lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 15:09:41 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Martin Uecker <Martin.Uecker@....uni-goettingen.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>, Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/const.h: Explain how __is_constexpr() works On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 02:05:53PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > I don't think adding slightly inaccurate comments would help a future > reader at all. Then it's better to just stick to Linus' "it's art, and > art should not be explained". /* You are not expected to understand this */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists