lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:18:39 +0100 From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Robert Święcki <robert@...ecki.net>, stable@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] signal: HANDLER_EXIT should clear SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 3:53 AM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote: > Fatal SIGSYS signals were not being delivered to pid namespace init > processes. Make sure the SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE doesn't get set for these > cases. > > Reported-by: Robert Święcki <robert@...ecki.net> > Suggested-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com> > Fixes: 00b06da29cf9 ("signal: Add SA_IMMUTABLE to ensure forced siganls do not get changed") > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> > --- > kernel/signal.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c > index 38602738866e..33e3ee4f3383 100644 > --- a/kernel/signal.c > +++ b/kernel/signal.c > @@ -1342,9 +1342,10 @@ force_sig_info_to_task(struct kernel_siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t, > } > /* > * Don't clear SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE for traced tasks, users won't expect > - * debugging to leave init killable. > + * debugging to leave init killable, unless it is intended to exit. > */ > - if (action->sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL && !t->ptrace) > + if (action->sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL && > + (!t->ptrace || (handler == HANDLER_EXIT))) > t->signal->flags &= ~SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE; You're changing the subclause: !t->ptrace to: (!t->ptrace || (handler == HANDLER_EXIT)) which means that the change only affects cases where the process has a ptracer, right? That's not the scenario the commit message is talking about... > ret = send_signal(sig, info, t, PIDTYPE_PID); > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&t->sighand->siglock, flags); > -- > 2.30.2 >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists