lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 24 Feb 2022 16:34:08 -0800
From:   Dan Li <>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] AARCH64: Add gcc Shadow Call Stack support

On 2/23/22 09:39, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:50:21AM -0800, Dan Li wrote:
>> My intention is to remind users that this is a compiler feature.
>> But since there is also a hint in CC_HAVE_SHADOW_CALL_STACK:
>> +# Supported by clang >= 7.0 or GCC ...
>> Removing the specific compiler here also looks fine to me.
>> Would this look better?
>> "This option enables Shadow Call Stack, which uses a ..."
>> or maybe:
>> "This option enables compiler's Shadow Call Stack, which uses a ..."
> I do not honestly have a strong opinion around removing mention of the
> compiler so either looks fine to me (might be better to say "the
> compiler's Shadow ..." in the second one).

Ah, yes, thanks :)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists