linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] mm: Handle ksize() vs __alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKwvOdm5pRtyf8W2c4q_xt353Kp+BSsC7qo5OE6VOEfOLCOJZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Feb 2022 14:42:12 -0800
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Handle ksize() vs __alloc_size by forgetting size

On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 2:16 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
> index 37bde99b74af..a14f3bfa2f44 100644
> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
> @@ -182,8 +182,32 @@ int kmem_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *s);
>  void * __must_check krealloc(const void *objp, size_t new_size, gfp_t flags) __alloc_size(2);
>  void kfree(const void *objp);
>  void kfree_sensitive(const void *objp);
> +
> +/**
> + * ksize - get the actual amount of memory allocated for a given object
> + * @objp: Pointer to the object
> + *
> + * kmalloc may internally round up allocations and return more memory
> + * than requested. ksize() can be used to determine the actual amount of
> + * memory allocated. The caller may use this additional memory, even though
> + * a smaller amount of memory was initially specified with the kmalloc call.
> + * The caller must guarantee that objp points to a valid object previously
> + * allocated with either kmalloc() or kmem_cache_alloc(). The object
> + * must not be freed during the duration of the call.
> + *
> + * Return: size of the actual memory used by @objp in bytes
> + */
> +#define ksize(objp) ({                                                 \
> +       /*                                                              \
> +        * Getting the actual allocation size means the __alloc_size    \
> +        * hints are no longer valid, and the compiler needs to         \
> +        * forget about them.                                           \
> +        */                                                             \
> +       OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(objp);                                       \
> +       _ksize(objp);                                                   \
> +})
>  size_t __ksize(const void *objp);
> -size_t ksize(const void *objp);
> +size_t _ksize(const void *objp);

If you wanted to discourage others from calling _ksize, you could hide
its declaration within the scope of statement expression within ksize:
https://godbolt.org/z/e4sd4nE6q
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers