[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YjmRB9BGftCBWBy+@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 10:04:07 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Keith Packard <keithpac@...zon.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 24/32] ARM: run softirqs on the per-CPU IRQ stack
On 2022-01-24 18:47:36 [+0100], Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> @@ -58,6 +61,17 @@ static void __init init_irq_stacks(void)
> }
> }
>
> +static void ____do_softirq(void *arg)
> +{
> + __do_softirq();
> +}
> +
> +void do_softirq_own_stack(void)
> +{
> + call_with_stack(____do_softirq, NULL,
> + __this_cpu_read(irq_stack_ptr));
> +}
> +
Do I miss the obvious here or is the irq_stack_ptr only used for
softirqs and not for hardirqs?
> int arch_show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, int prec)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_FIQ
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists