[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2fff1c4d0efdcda670ddc3683e383f6472d91e85.camel@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 08:10:26 +0000
From: "Coelho, Luciano" <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
To: "kvalo@...nel.org" <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"gustavoars@...nel.org" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
CC: "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] iwlwifi: mei: Replace zero-length array with
flexible-array member
On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 08:48 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:35:22PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 01:50:30PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > > There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare
> > > > having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure.
> > > > Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these
> > > > cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should
> > > > no longer be used[2].
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
> > > > [2]
> > > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.16/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
> > > >
> > > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/78
> > > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Friendly ping: can someone take this, please?
> >
> > ...I can take this in my -next tree in the meantime.
>
> I'll take this. Luca, ack?
Acked-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
--
Cheers,
Luca.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists