lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:28:20 -0700 From: Dan Li <ashimida@...ux.alibaba.com> To: catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org, arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, nathan@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com, shuah@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, ojeda@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, elver@...gle.com, luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com, samitolvanen@...gle.com Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] lkdtm: Add Shadow Call Stack tests Hi Kees, Gentile ping for this :). I also saw the discussion on llvm-project, use address of labels as a parameter doesn't seem to be stable. Do we need to split it into two cases here? Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54328 Thanks, Dan On 3/14/22 06:53, Dan Li wrote: > Add tests for SCS (Shadow Call Stack) based backward CFI. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Li <ashimida@...ux.alibaba.com> > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h | 18 ++++++ > drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c | 1 + > drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h | 1 + > include/linux/compiler-clang.h | 1 + > include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 2 + > include/linux/compiler_types.h | 4 ++ > tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/tests.txt | 1 + > 8 files changed, 112 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h > index dc3ea4080e2e..96590fb4a8de 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h > @@ -8,6 +8,24 @@ > #define ARM64_ASM_PREAMBLE > #endif > > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ > +#ifdef __KERNEL__ > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL > +# define __no_ptrauth __attribute__((target("branch-protection=bti"))) > +#elif defined(CONFIG_CC_HAS_BRANCH_PROT_PAC_RET) > +# define __no_ptrauth __attribute__((target("branch-protection=none"))) > +#elif defined(CONFIG_CC_HAS_SIGN_RETURN_ADDRESS) > +# define __no_ptrauth __attribute__((target("sign-return-address=none"))) > +#endif > + > +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL */ > + > +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */ > +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ > + > /* > * The EL0/EL1 pointer bits used by a pointer authentication code. > * This is dependent on TBI0/TBI1 being enabled, or bits 63:56 would also apply. > diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c > index c9aeddef1044..468ba2f26f74 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c > +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c > @@ -41,3 +41,87 @@ void lkdtm_CFI_FORWARD_PROTO(void) > pr_err("FAIL: survived mismatched prototype function call!\n"); > pr_expected_config(CONFIG_CFI_CLANG); > } > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64 > +/* > + * This function is used to modify its return address. The PAC needs to be turned > + * off here to ensure that the modification of the return address will not be blocked. > + */ > +static noinline __no_ptrauth > +void lkdtm_scs_set_lr(unsigned long *expected, unsigned long *addr) > +{ > + /* Use of volatile is to make sure final write isn't seen as a dead store. */ > + unsigned long * volatile *ret_addr = (unsigned long **)__builtin_frame_address(0) + 1; > + > + /* Make sure we've found the right place on the stack before writing it. */ > + if (*ret_addr == expected) > + *ret_addr = addr; > +} > + > +/* Function with __noscs attribute attempts to modify its return address. */ > +static noinline __no_ptrauth __noscs > +void lkdtm_noscs_set_lr(unsigned long *expected, unsigned long *addr) > +{ > + /* Use of volatile is to make sure final write isn't seen as a dead store. */ > + unsigned long * volatile *ret_addr = (unsigned long **)__builtin_frame_address(0) + 1; > + > + /* Make sure we've found the right place on the stack before writing it. */ > + if (*ret_addr == expected) > + *ret_addr = addr; > +} > +#else > +static inline void lkdtm_noscs_set_lr(unsigned long *expected, unsigned long *addr) { } > +static inline void lkdtm_scs_set_lr(unsigned long *expected, unsigned long *addr) { } > +#endif > + > +static volatile unsigned int force_label; > + > +/* > + * This first checks whether a function with the __noscs attribute under > + * the current platform can directly modify its return address, and if so, > + * checks whether scs takes effect. > + */ > +void __no_optimize lkdtm_CFI_BACKWARD_SHADOW(void) > +{ > + void *array[] = {&&unexpected, &&expected, &&good_scs, &&bad_scs}; > + > + if (force_label && (force_label < sizeof(array))) { > + /* > + * Call them with "NULL" first to avoid > + * arguments being treated as constants in -02. > + */ > + lkdtm_noscs_set_lr(NULL, NULL); > + lkdtm_scs_set_lr(NULL, NULL); > + goto *array[force_label]; > + } > + > + /* Keep labels in scope to avoid compiler warnings. */ > + do { > + /* Verify the "normal" condition of LR corruption working. */ > + pr_info("Trying to corrupt lr in a function without scs protection ...\n"); > + lkdtm_noscs_set_lr(&&unexpected, &&expected); > + > +unexpected: > + /* > + * If lr cannot be modified, the following check is meaningless, > + * returns directly. > + */ > + pr_err("XPASS: Unexpectedly survived lr corruption without scs?!\n"); > + break; > + > +expected: > + pr_info("ok: lr corruption redirected without scs.\n"); > + > + /* Verify that SCS is in effect. */ > + pr_info("Trying to corrupt lr in a function with scs protection ...\n"); > + lkdtm_scs_set_lr(&&good_scs, &&bad_scs); > + > +good_scs: > + pr_info("ok: scs takes effect.\n"); > + break; > + > +bad_scs: > + pr_err("FAIL: return address rewritten!\n"); > + pr_expected_config(CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK); > + } while (0); > +} > diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c > index f69b964b9952..7af7268b82e4 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c > +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c > @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ static const struct crashtype crashtypes[] = { > CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_KERNEL), > CRASHTYPE(STACKLEAK_ERASING), > CRASHTYPE(CFI_FORWARD_PROTO), > + CRASHTYPE(CFI_BACKWARD_SHADOW), > CRASHTYPE(FORTIFIED_OBJECT), > CRASHTYPE(FORTIFIED_SUBOBJECT), > CRASHTYPE(FORTIFIED_STRSCPY), > diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h > index d6137c70ebbe..a66fba949ab5 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h > +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h > @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ void lkdtm_STACKLEAK_ERASING(void); > > /* cfi.c */ > void lkdtm_CFI_FORWARD_PROTO(void); > +void lkdtm_CFI_BACKWARD_SHADOW(void); > > /* fortify.c */ > void lkdtm_FORTIFIED_OBJECT(void); > diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h > index 3c4de9b6c6e3..2db37db36651 100644 > --- a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h > +++ b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h > @@ -68,3 +68,4 @@ > > #define __nocfi __attribute__((__no_sanitize__("cfi"))) > #define __cficanonical __attribute__((__cfi_canonical_jump_table__)) > +#define __no_optimize __attribute__((optnone)) > diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h > index deff5b308470..28d1b0ec6656 100644 > --- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h > +++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h > @@ -162,3 +162,5 @@ > #if GCC_VERSION < 90100 > #undef __alloc_size__ > #endif > + > +#define __no_optimize __attribute__((optimize("-O0"))) > diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_types.h b/include/linux/compiler_types.h > index 3c1795fdb568..f5ad83f7ea2f 100644 > --- a/include/linux/compiler_types.h > +++ b/include/linux/compiler_types.h > @@ -257,6 +257,10 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data { > # define __nocfi > #endif > > +#ifndef __no_ptrauth > +# define __no_ptrauth > +#endif > + > #ifndef __cficanonical > # define __cficanonical > #endif > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/tests.txt b/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/tests.txt > index 6b36b7f5dcf9..12df67a3b419 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/tests.txt > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/tests.txt > @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND > USERCOPY_KERNEL > STACKLEAK_ERASING OK: the rest of the thread stack is properly erased > CFI_FORWARD_PROTO > +CFI_BACKWARD_SHADOW ok: scs takes effect > FORTIFIED_STRSCPY > FORTIFIED_OBJECT > FORTIFIED_SUBOBJECT
Powered by blists - more mailing lists