linux-hardening - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] Kernel FineIBT Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Apr 2022 09:40:44 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     joao@...rdrivepizza.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        jpoimboe@...hat.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com,
        keescook@...omium.org, samitolvanen@...gle.com,
        mark.rutland@....com, hjl.tools@...il.com,
        alyssa.milburn@...ux.intel.com, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
        gabriel.gomes@...ux.intel.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] Kernel FineIBT Support

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 05:42:30PM -0700, joao@...rdrivepizza.com wrote:
> @PeterZ @JoshP
> 
> I'm a bit unaware of the details on why the objtool approach to bypass ENDBRs
> was removed from the IBT series. Is this approach now sensible considering that
> it is a requirement for a new/enhanced feature? If not, how extending the Linker
> to emit already fixed offsets sounds like?

Josh hates objtool modifying actualy code. He much prefers objtool only
emits out of band data.

Now, I did sneak in that jump_label nop'ing, and necessity (broken
compilers) had us do the KCOV nop'ing in noinstr, but if you look at the
recent objtool series here:

  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1650300597.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com

you'll see his thoughs on that :-)

Now, I obviously don't mind, it's easy enough to figure out what objtool
actually does with something like:

  $ OBJTOOL_ARGS="--backup" make O=ibt-build/ -j$lots vmlinux
  $ objdiff.sh ibt-build/vmlinux.o

Where objdiff.sh is the below crummy script.

Now, one compromise that I did get out of Josh was that he objected less
to rewriting relocations than to rewriting the immediates. From my
testing the relocations got us the vast majority of direct call sites,
very few are immediates.

Josh, any way you might reconsider all that? :-)

---
#!/bin/bash

name=$1
pre=${name}.orig
post=${name}

function to_text {
	obj=$1
	( objdump -wdr $obj;
	  readelf -W --relocs --symbols $obj |
		  awk '/^Relocation section/ { $6=0 } { print $0 }'
	) > ${obj}.tmp
}

to_text $pre
to_text $post

diff -u ${pre}.tmp ${post}.tmp

rm ${pre}.tmp ${post}.tmp