[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e8cb3d63-f5b9-d067-af66-86f7a7c7f76c@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:20:11 -0700
From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Allen Pais <apais@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: olivier.dautricourt@...lia.com, sr@...x.de, keescook@...omium.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com,
tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
rjui@...adcom.com, sbranden@...adcom.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, nsaenz@...nel.org,
paul@...pouillou.net, Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com,
gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com, vireshk@...nel.org,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, leoyang.li@....com,
zw@...kernel.org, wangzhou1@...ilicon.com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, afaerber@...e.de, mani@...nel.org,
logang@...tatee.com, sanju.mehta@....com, daniel@...que.org,
haojian.zhuang@...il.com, robert.jarzmik@...e.fr,
agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, green.wan@...ive.com,
orsonzhai@...il.com, baolin.wang7@...il.com, zhang.lyra@...il.com,
patrice.chotard@...s.st.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
wens@...e.org, jernej.skrabec@...il.com, samuel@...lland.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] drivers/dma/*: replace tasklets with workqueue
On 4/26/2022 7:45 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 19-04-22, 21:16, Allen Pais wrote:
>> The tasklet is an old API which will be deprecated, workqueue API
>> cab be used instead of them.
> What is the reason for tasklet removal, I am not sure old is a reason to
> remove an API...
>
>> This patch replaces the tasklet usage in drivers/dma/* with a
>> simple work.
> Dmaengines need very high throughput, one of the reasons in dmaengine
> API design to use tasklet was higher priority given to them. Will the
> workqueue allow that...?
Wouldn't the logical move be to convert threaded irq IF tasklets are
being deprecated rather than using workqueue as replacement?
Also, wouldn't all the spin_lock_bh() calls need to be changed to
spin_lock_irqsave() now? Probably not as simple as just replace tasklet
with workqueue.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists