[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABCJKufNUoJJPcraG-o2AvTBSWmFEQAzg0z-Z=xLohBqsMA3KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 18:00:03 -0700
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Joao Moreira <joao@...rdrivepizza.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 16/21] objtool: Add support for CONFIG_CFI_CLANG
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 4:30 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> Urgh, what does this do for decode speed? This is a hash-lookup for
> every single instruction.
Two actually, since .kcfi_traps only contains compiler-emitted
locations and we also have to check for manual type annotations. I
haven't measured performance yet, but I also didn't notice a
significant impact here.
> Is that kcfi location array sorted by the compiler? Because then you can
> keep a running iterator and replace the whole lookup with a simple
> equality comparison.
The compiler generates a separate .kcfi_types section for each text
section and the entries are emitted in order, so this should be
doable.
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists