lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 18 May 2022 00:22:24 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <>
To:     Kees Cook <>
Cc:     Christophe de Dinechin <>,
        Ingo Molnar <>,
        Juri Lelli <>,
        Vincent Guittot <>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <>,
        Steven Rostedt <>,
        Ben Segall <>, Mel Gorman <>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <>,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/core: Address classes via __begin_sched_classes

On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 10:35:44AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:

> What you've got below is almost exactly what I had in my first attempt
> at this (that I never posted). What I was missing and couldn't track
> down were the places you used sched_class_above(). I should have sent
> _that_ patch and asked where the comparisons were that I couldn't find.
> I think what you've got is much cleaner, as it makes the for loop use
> the normal iterator idiom.

Don't feel too bad; I forgot about the comparison in
check_preempt_curr() myself and cursed a while trying to figure out why
it stopped booting.

Anyway; I suppose I'll go queue the thing in sched/core so we can forget
about all this again.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists