lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 14:40:24 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] kasan: test: Silence GCC 12 warnings GCC 12 continues to get smarter about array accesses. The KASAN tests are expecting to explicitly test out-of-bounds conditions at run-time, so hide the variable from GCC, to avoid warnings like: ../lib/test_kasan.c: In function 'ksize_uaf': ../lib/test_kasan.c:790:61: warning: array subscript 120 is outside array bounds of 'void[120]' [-Warray-bounds] 790 | KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ((volatile char *)ptr)[size]); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~ ../lib/test_kasan.c:97:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL' 97 | expression; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~ Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com> Cc: kasan-dev@...glegroups.com Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> --- lib/test_kasan.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/test_kasan.c b/lib/test_kasan.c index c233b1a4e984..58c1b01ccfe2 100644 --- a/lib/test_kasan.c +++ b/lib/test_kasan.c @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ static void kmalloc_oob_right(struct kunit *test) ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr); /* * An unaligned access past the requested kmalloc size. * Only generic KASAN can precisely detect these. @@ -159,6 +160,7 @@ static void kmalloc_oob_left(struct kunit *test) ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr); KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, *ptr = *(ptr - 1)); kfree(ptr); } @@ -171,6 +173,7 @@ static void kmalloc_node_oob_right(struct kunit *test) ptr = kmalloc_node(size, GFP_KERNEL, 0); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr); KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ptr[0] = ptr[size]); kfree(ptr); } @@ -191,6 +194,7 @@ static void kmalloc_pagealloc_oob_right(struct kunit *test) ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr); KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ptr[size + OOB_TAG_OFF] = 0); kfree(ptr); @@ -271,6 +275,7 @@ static void kmalloc_large_oob_right(struct kunit *test) ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr); KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ptr[size] = 0); kfree(ptr); } @@ -410,6 +415,8 @@ static void kmalloc_oob_16(struct kunit *test) ptr2 = kmalloc(sizeof(*ptr2), GFP_KERNEL); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr2); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr1); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr2); KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, *ptr1 = *ptr2); kfree(ptr1); kfree(ptr2); @@ -756,6 +763,8 @@ static void ksize_unpoisons_memory(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr); real_size = ksize(ptr); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr); + /* This access shouldn't trigger a KASAN report. */ ptr[size] = 'x'; @@ -778,6 +787,7 @@ static void ksize_uaf(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr); kfree(ptr); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr); KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ksize(ptr)); KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ((volatile char *)ptr)[0]); KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ((volatile char *)ptr)[size]); -- 2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists