linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] usercopy: use unsigned long instead of uintptr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Jun 2022 17:36:34 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Jason@...c4.com,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, urezki@...il.com, joe@...ches.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usercopy: use unsigned long instead of uintptr_t

On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 09:29:12AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:

> Given Linus's confirmation: applied to for-next/hardening, thanks! I
> do note, however, that we have almost 1700 uses of uintptr_t in the
> kernel. Perhaps we need to add a section to the CodingStyle doc?

checkpatch too.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)