[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOUHufbUUf1--=qiseAYzjN2DdyCkf_x=CQboWYDduH7VgpXmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 20:20:00 -0600
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, dev@...-flo.net,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86/dumpstack: Inline copy_from_user_nmi()
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 8:01 AM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This fixes a find_vmap_area() deadlock. The main fix is patch 2, repeated here:
>
> The check_object_size() helper under CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY is
> designed to skip any checks where the length is known at compile time as
> a reasonable heuristic to avoid "likely known-good" cases. However, it can
> only do this when the copy_*_user() helpers are, themselves, inline too.
>
> Using find_vmap_area() requires taking a spinlock. The check_object_size()
> helper can call find_vmap_area() when the destination is in vmap memory.
> If show_regs() is called in interrupt context, it will attempt a call to
> copy_from_user_nmi(), which may call check_object_size() and then
> find_vmap_area(). If something in normal context happens to be in the
> middle of calling find_vmap_area() (with the spinlock held), the interrupt
> handler will hang forever.
>
> The copy_from_user_nmi() call is actually being called with a fixed-size
> length, so check_object_size() should never have been called in the
> first place. In order for check_object_size() to see that the length is
> a fixed size, inline copy_from_user_nmi(), as already done with all the
> other uaccess helpers.
>
> Reported-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAOUHufaPshtKrTWOz7T7QFYUNVGFm0JBjvM700Nhf9qEL9b3EQ@mail.gmail.com
> Reported-by: dev@...-flo.net
>
> Patch 1 is a refactor for patch 2, and patch 3 should make sure we avoid
> future deadlocks.
Thanks!
Tested-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
The same test has been holding up well for a few hours now. It used to
throw that warning in less than half an hour.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists