lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202209261123.B2CBAE87E0@keescook> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:24:37 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@...el.com>, Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, dev@...nvswitch.org, x86@...nel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/16] mempool: Use kmalloc_size_roundup() to match ksize() usage On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 03:50:43PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 9/23/22 22:28, Kees Cook wrote: > > Round up allocations with kmalloc_size_roundup() so that mempool's use > > of ksize() is always accurate and no special handling of the memory is > > needed by KASAN, UBSAN_BOUNDS, nor FORTIFY_SOURCE. > > > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> > > Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> > > --- > > mm/mempool.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/mempool.c b/mm/mempool.c > > index 96488b13a1ef..0f3107b28e6b 100644 > > --- a/mm/mempool.c > > +++ b/mm/mempool.c > > @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mempool_free_slab); > > */ > > void *mempool_kmalloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, void *pool_data) > > { > > - size_t size = (size_t)pool_data; > > + size_t size = kmalloc_size_roundup((size_t)pool_data); > > Hm it is kinda wasteful to call into kmalloc_size_roundup for every > allocation that has the same input. We could do it just once in > mempool_init_node() for adjusting pool->pool_data ? > > But looking more closely, I wonder why poison_element() and > kasan_unpoison_element() in mm/mempool.c even have to use ksize()/__ksize() > and not just operate on the requested size (again, pool->pool_data). If no > kmalloc mempool's users use ksize() to write beyond requested size, then we > don't have to unpoison/poison that area either? Yeah, I think that's a fair point. I will adjust this. -- Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists