lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 2 Oct 2022 12:33:13 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        keescook@...omium.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mm: Refuse W^X violations

On Wed 2022-09-21 13:59:06, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 9/21/22 13:07, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > [    2.042861] CPA refuse W^X violation: 8000000000000063 -> 0000000000000063 range: 0x00000000c00a0000 - 0x00000000c00a0fff PFN a0
> > ILLOPC: cbc65efa: 0f 0b
> > [    2.043267] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c:600 __change_page_attr_set_clr+0xdca/0xdd0
> ...
> > [    2.050307] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> > [    2.050762] PCI: PCI BIOS area is rw and x. Use pci=nobios if you want it NX.
> > [    2.051115] kernel tried to execute NX-protected page - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
> > [    2.051115] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: c00fd2bf
> 
> This _looks_ like it is working as intended.  The PCI BIOS code tried to
> make a RWX page.  The CPA code refused to do it and presumably returned
> an error, leaving a RW page, non-executable page.  The PCI code didn't
> check the set_memory_x() return code and tried to go execute anyway.
> That resulted in the oops.
> 
> I was able to reproduce this pretty easily.  The workaround from dmesg
> is pci=nobios.  That seems to do the trick for me, although that advise
> was sandwiched between a warning and an oops, so not the easiest to find.
> 
> I'm a bit torn what to do on this one.  Breaking the boot is bad, but so
> is leaving RWX memory around.

Well, the original patch is bad. Boot regressions are not acceptable.

We should first add an WARN_ON(), debug and fix the failures, then we
can start refusing the transitions.

Best regards,
								Pavel

-- 
People of Russia, stop Putin before his war on Ukraine escalates.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists