lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <0d037ef8-e301-c0fd-8020-3846a4762ade@igalia.com> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 12:19:24 -0300 From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com> To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-dev@...lia.com, kernel@...ccoli.net, keescook@...omium.org, anton@...msg.org, ccross@...roid.com, tony.luck@...el.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] efi: pstore: Add module parameter for setting the record size On 14/10/2022 12:00, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 at 16:58, Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@...lia.com> wrote: >> >> On 14/10/2022 11:46, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>> [...] >>>> for (;;) { >>>> - varname_size = EFIVARS_DATA_SIZE_MAX; >>>> + varname_size = record_size; >>>> >>> >>> I don't think we need this - this is the size of the variable name not >>> the variable itself. >>> >> >> Ugh, my bad. Do you want to stick with 1024 then? > > Yes let's keep this at 1024 Perfect, will re-send after we have more feedback on patches 1 and 2. Thanks again, Guilherme
Powered by blists - more mailing lists