linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] pstore: migrate to crypto acomp interface (take 2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMj1kXGA=kBdahDTuFDPzZKf5bbvxH2Ns7Ows+5D-PAx8rwP2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2022 23:16:35 +0200
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To:     "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
        Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore: migrate to crypto acomp interface (take 2)

On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 23:10, Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@...lia.com> wrote:
>
> On 17/10/2022 18:01, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > In summary, we're better off sticking with the legacy comp interface,
> > but unfortunately, due to the way that has been plumbed into the
> > scomp/acomp with scatterlists version, that doesn't really help us get
> > rid of the memory overhead.
> >
>
> Out of curiosity, do you have a number here, like X kilobytes per active
> CPU?

2x128 KB per CPU, which makes 128  KB also the maximum input/output
size per request when using this interface. (SCOMP_SCRATCH_SIZE)

On my 32x4 CPU workstation, this amounts to 32 MB permanently locked
up for nothing when the pstore driver is loaded (with compression
enabled)