[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202212141448.03552F3@keescook>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 14:48:28 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>
Cc: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
Dan Li <ashimida@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lkdtm: Add CFI_BACKWARD to test ROP mitigations
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 05:34:41PM +0000, Kristina Martsenko wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] lkdtm: cfi: Make PAC test work with GCC 7 and 8
>
> The CFI test uses the branch-protection=none compiler attribute to
> disable PAC return address protection on a function. While newer GCC
> versions support this attribute, older versions (GCC 7 and 8) instead
> supported the sign-return-address=none attribute, leading to a build
> failure when the test is built with older compilers. Fix it by checking
> which attribute is supported and using the correct one.
>
> Fixes: 2e53b877dc12 ("lkdtm: Add CFI_BACKWARD to test ROP mitigations")
> Reported-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAEUSe78kDPxQmQqCWW-_9LCgJDFhAeMoVBFnX9QLx18Z4uT4VQ@mail.gmail.com/
Thanks! Added to my tree.
> ---
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c
> index 5245cf6013c9..d4bb8e31a2fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,11 @@ static void lkdtm_CFI_FORWARD_PROTO(void)
> # ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL
> # define __no_pac "branch-protection=bti"
> # else
> -# define __no_pac "branch-protection=none"
> +# ifdef CONFIG_CC_HAS_BRANCH_PROT_PAC_RET
> +# define __no_pac "branch-protection=none"
> +# else
> +# define __no_pac "sign-return-address=none"
> +# endif
> # endif
> # define __no_ret_protection __noscs __attribute__((__target__(__no_pac)))
> #else
>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists