linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] io_uring: Replace 0-length array with flexible array

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 12:01:22 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
        Dylan Yudaken <dylany@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: Replace 0-length array with flexible array

[resend -- I failed to CC the thread]

On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 08:38:01PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 10:04:19AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 08:39:48AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 07:37:48PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > Zero-length arrays are deprecated[1]. Replace struct io_uring_buf_ring's
> > > > "bufs" with a flexible array member. (How is the size of this array
> > > > verified?) Detected with GCC 13, using -fstrict-flex-arrays=3:
> > > > 
> > > > In function 'io_ring_buffer_select',
> > > >     inlined from 'io_buffer_select' at io_uring/kbuf.c:183:10:
> > > > io_uring/kbuf.c:141:23: warning: array subscript 255 is outside the bounds of an interior zero-length array 'struct io_uring_buf[0]' [-Wzero-length-bounds]
> > > >   141 |                 buf = &br->bufs[head];
> > > >       |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > In file included from include/linux/io_uring.h:7,
> > > >                  from io_uring/kbuf.c:10:
> > > > include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h: In function 'io_buffer_select':
> > > > include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h:628:41: note: while referencing 'bufs'
> > > >   628 |                 struct io_uring_buf     bufs[0];
> > > >       |                                         ^~~~
> > > > 
> > > > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: c7fb19428d67 ("io_uring: add support for ring mapped supplied buffers")
> > > > Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> > > > Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
> > > > Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> > > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > 
> > > Build problem aside, why is this a stable kernel issue?
> > 
> > My thinking was that since this is technically a UAPI change, it'd be
> > best to get it changed as widely as possible.
> 
> You can't break the uapi, so it should be the same with or without your
> change right?
> 
> confused,

Correct -- but we've had a hard time finding breakages (with extremely
weird stuff like non-C .h file scrapers) due to the lag between making
UAPI changes like this.

Anyway, I can drop the CC stable if it's more sensible.

-- 
Kees Cook