[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAODwPW9SaomZjWQvR1mmV7OzvQkq-_XoDgSmK04fO5rVMGHmpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 16:02:26 +0100
From: Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Jack Rosenthal <jrosenth@...omium.org>,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] firmware: coreboot: Check size of table entry and
split memcpy
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
> - memcpy(&device->entry, ptr_entry, entry->size);
> + memcpy(device->raw, entry, entry->size);
nit: It's a bit odd to change the source pointer from ptr_entry to
entry here. Technically the static analyzer would be within its rights
to give you a warning for that as well, because you're now
"overrunning" the source struct instead of the destination one.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists