linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] docs: deprecated.rst: Add note about DECLARE_FLEX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2023 16:11:41 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: deprecated.rst: Add note about
 DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() usage

Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:

> There wasn't any mention of when/where DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() should be
> used, so add the rationale and an example to the deprecation docs.
>
> Suggested-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/process/deprecated.rst | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)

I've applied this, but couldn't resist making one tweak...

> diff --git a/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst b/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
> index c8fd53a11a20..fcac0a929efa 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
> @@ -346,3 +346,29 @@ struct_size() and flex_array_size() helpers::
>          instance->count = count;
>  
>          memcpy(instance->items, source, flex_array_size(instance, items, instance->count));
> +
> +There are two special cases of replacement where the DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY()
> +helper needs to be used. (Note that it is named __DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() for
> +use in UAPI headers.) When the flexible array is either alone in a struct,
> +or is part of a union. 

The pedant in me couldn't stand leaving that sentence fragment, so I
made a complete sentence out of it.

Thanks,

jon