linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] pstore/ram: Rework logic for detecting ramoops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2023 13:59:52 +0530
From:   Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
To:     "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
        <keescook@...omium.org>, <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC:     <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore/ram: Rework logic for detecting ramoops

Hi Guilherme,

On 1/11/2023 6:31 PM, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Thanks for the patch Mukesh! I don't have a DT hardware at hand right
> now, so cannot test this one myself. I'll just provide a (really) minor
> feedback, something to address in a potential V2 or even in merge time,
> see below.
> 
> 
> On 11/01/2023 06:07, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>> The reserved memory region for ramoops is assumed to be at a fixed
>> and known location when read from the devicetree. This is not desirable
>> in environments where it is preferred the region to be dynamically
>> allocated at runtime, as opposed to being fixed at compile time.
>>
>> Also, Some of the platforms might be still expecting dedicated
> 
> I'd write "Also, some" instead of upper "Some".

> 
>> memory region for ramoops node where the region is known
>> beforehand and platform_get_resource() is used in that case.
>>
>> So, Add logic to detect the start and size of the ramoops memory
> 
> Same here, maybe "So, add".
> 

Thanks for the review.

Will fix it along with other comments.
Also, let me know if we need to change binding or document update as well.

-Mukesh

> Really minor nits, though!
> Cheers
> 
> 
> Guilherme