lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 28 Jan 2023 11:29:28 -0800
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sched: sch: Bounds check priority

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 02:40:37PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Nothing was explicitly bounds checking the priority index used to access
> clpriop[]. WARN and bail out early if it's pathological. Seen with GCC 13:
> 
> ../net/sched/sch_htb.c: In function 'htb_activate_prios':
> ../net/sched/sch_htb.c:437:44: warning: array subscript [0, 31] is outside array bounds of 'struct htb_prio[8]' [-Warray-bounds=]
>   437 |                         if (p->inner.clprio[prio].feed.rb_node)
>       |                             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
> ../net/sched/sch_htb.c:131:41: note: while referencing 'clprio'
>   131 |                         struct htb_prio clprio[TC_HTB_NUMPRIO];
>       |                                         ^~~~~~

Reviewed-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>

We already have a check in htb_change_class():

2056                 if ((cl->prio = hopt->prio) >= TC_HTB_NUMPRIO)
2057                         cl->prio = TC_HTB_NUMPRIO - 1;

so this patch is just to make GCC 13 happy.

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ