lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2023 16:32:16 +0000
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
        Yongqin Liu <yongqin.liu@...aro.org>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Support Clang UBSAN trap codes for better
 reporting

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 09:58:26AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 10:36:57PM +0000, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On arm64, Clang encodes the UBSAN check type in the esr. Extract this
> > and actually report UBSAN traps with some specificity when building with
> > CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP. Before:
> 
> Really minor nit, but could we mention CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP at the start, e.g.
> change that first sentence to:
> 
> | When CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP=y on arm64, Clang encodes the UBSAN check type into a
> | BRK immediate, which is reported in the ESR.
> 
> I was initially confused since I was aware that there are usually direct
> function calls for the reporting.

Sure, I can rearrange the commit log.

> 
> Other than that, this looks fine to me, and regardless of the above:
> 
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>

Thanks!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ