[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d563cca7-57c6-289a-f551-a378f219aed4@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2023 14:00:55 +0100
From: Bodo Stroesser <bostroesser@...il.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] uapi: target: Replace fake flex-array with
flexible-array member
On 17.03.23 17:59, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Zero-length arrays as fake flexible arrays are deprecated and we are
> moving towards adopting C99 flexible-array members instead.
>
> Address the following warning found with GCC-13 and
> -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 enabled:
> CC drivers/target/target_core_user.o
> drivers/target/target_core_user.c: In function ‘queue_cmd_ring’:
> drivers/target/target_core_user.c:1096:15: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of ‘struct iovec[0]’ [-Warray-bounds=]
> 1096 | iov = &entry->req.iov[0];
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from drivers/target/target_core_user.c:31:
> ./include/uapi/linux/target_core_user.h:122:38: note: while referencing ‘iov’
> 122 | struct iovec iov[0];
> | ^~~
>
> This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE
> routines on memcpy() and help us make progress towards globally
> enabling -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 [1].
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/270
> Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602902.html [1]
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/target_core_user.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/target_core_user.h b/include/uapi/linux/target_core_user.h
> index fbd8ca67e107..f925a77f19ed 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/target_core_user.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/target_core_user.h
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ struct tcmu_cmd_entry {
> __u64 cdb_off;
> __u64 __pad1;
> __u64 __pad2;
> - struct iovec iov[0];
> + __DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct iovec, iov);
> } req;
> struct {
> __u8 scsi_status;
Looks good. Thank you.
Reviewed-by: Bodo Stroesser <bostroesser@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists