linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH][next] platform/chrome: Fix -Warray-bounds warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZCU2FBWqDQZFuWDL@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2023 09:11:16 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] platform/chrome: Fix -Warray-bounds warnings

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 03:01:23PM +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 07:54:02PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > In this case, as only enough space for the op field is allocated,
> > we can use an object of type uint32_t instead of a whole
> > struct ec_params_vbnvcontext (for which not enough memory is
> > allocated).
> 
> It doesn't make sense to me.  See comments below.
> 
> > Fix the following warning seen under GCC 13:
> > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_vbc.c: In function ‘vboot_context_read’:
> > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_vbc.c:36:15: warning: array subscript ‘struct ec_params_vbnvcontext[1]’ is partly outside array bounds of ‘unsigned char[36]’ [-Warray-bounds=]
> >    36 |         params->op = EC_VBNV_CONTEXT_OP_READ;
> >       |               ^~
> > In file included from drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_vbc.c:12:
> > In function ‘kmalloc’,
> >     inlined from ‘vboot_context_read’ at drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_vbc.c:30:8:
> > ./include/linux/slab.h:580:24: note: at offset 20 into object of size 36 allocated by ‘kmalloc_trace’
> >   580 |                 return kmalloc_trace(
> >       |                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >   581 |                                 kmalloc_caches[kmalloc_type(flags)][index],
> >       |                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >   582 |                                 flags, size);
> >       |                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Please trim the commit message a bit and try to wrap at 75 columns as
> [1] suggested.
> 
> [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#the-canonical-patch-format

For outputs from tools like this, going over 75 columns is fine, no need
to ever line-wrap stuff like this, that would just make it unreadable.

thanks,

greg k-h