linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] pstore/ram: Convert to platform remove callback returning void

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2023 15:50:49 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore/ram: Convert to platform remove callback
 returning void

On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 12:57:30PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> On 01/04/2023 09:00, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
> > many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
> > returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
> > and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
> > quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
> > quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
> > void.
> > 
> > Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
> > callback to the void returning variant.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> 
> Thanks, it makes sense for me! Code-wise, it looks fine.
> 
> What would be interesting it to mention a mail thread discussing this or
> maybe the patch itself that added the .remove_new() idea
> [https://git.kernel.org/linus/5c5a7680e67b right?].
> 
> BTW, nice idea - converting all at once would be a terrible sync effort,
> I guess this way things will go smoothly.
> Feel free to add my:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@...lia.com>

Thanks! Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

Do you want to take these view some other tree, or should I take this
via my pstore tree?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook