linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] ubsan: remove cc-option test for UBSAN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFP8O3K2c-7wCeDrxPaFpNe-yV9M1g0BPQw7qA6JdpUD74dC1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:13:53 -0700
From:   Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubsan: remove cc-option test for UBSAN_TRAP

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 8:12 AM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 05:12:24PM -0700, Fangrui Song wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 2:58 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 02:54:06PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error has been supported since GCC 5.1 and
> > > > Clang 3.2.  The minimum supported version of these according to
> > > > Documentation/process/changes.rst is 5.1 and 11.0.0 respectively. Drop
> > > > this cc-option check.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> > >
> > > As an aside, we should really consider having some standard format of
> > > comment around cc-option checks so that we can easily remove them when
> > > they become stale...
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Masahiro, Kees: get_maintainer.pl leaves much to be desired for this
> > > > file. Can one of you please pick this up?
> > > >
> > > >  lib/Kconfig.ubsan | 1 -
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.ubsan b/lib/Kconfig.ubsan
> > > > index fd15230a703b..0e7ad0782399 100644
> > > > --- a/lib/Kconfig.ubsan
> > > > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.ubsan
> > > > @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ if UBSAN
> > > >  config UBSAN_TRAP
> > > >       bool "On Sanitizer warnings, abort the running kernel code"
> > > >       depends on !COMPILE_TEST
> > > > -     depends on $(cc-option, -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error)
> > > >       help
> > > >         Building kernels with Sanitizer features enabled tends to grow
> > > >         the kernel size by around 5%, due to adding all the debugging
> > > > --
> > > > 2.40.0.577.gac1e443424-goog
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error is a legacy option from 2013 when
> > -fcatch-undefined-behavior instead of -fsanitize=undefined enabled
> > UBSan.
> > On the Clang side, http://reviews.llvm.org/D10464 added
> > -fsanitize-trap= in June 2015.
> > It's best to use -fsanitize-trap=undefined and avoid uses of
> > -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error.
>
> But that's Clang-only. -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error works for both
> GCC and Clang.
>
> --
> Kees Cook

Just filed a -fsanitize-trap= feature request for GCC:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109489 :)

https://reviews.llvm.org/D10464 (2015) does mention the state of the
legacy option:

  // https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#cmdoption-fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error
  -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error
  Deprecated alias for -fsanitize-trap=undefined.





-- 
宋方睿