[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03751d6651e65f848bfd7e574b53932a794f2f2a.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 17:46:44 +1000
From: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@...il.com>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/rtas: Replace one-element arrays with flexible
arrays
On Fri, 2023-01-27 at 07:10 -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > > > I see at least one place that consults the size of one of these
> > > > structs,
> > > > in get_pseries_errorlog():
> > > >
> > > > /* Check that we understand the format */
> > > > if (ext_log_length < sizeof(struct
> > > > rtas_ext_event_log_v6)
> > > > ||
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > Don't all such sites need to be audited/adjusted for changes
> > > > like
> > > > this?
I did actually see that site, and concluded that for the purposes of
that particular check, removing a single extra byte is irrelevant
(maybe it makes the check more strictly correct, what if the vendor_log
is actually of length 0?)
Doing a binary diff, as Kees suggests, over the object files in
arch/powerpc:
- there's no difference at all caused by changing
rtas_ext_event_log_v6.vendor_log, which kind of surprises me given the
above.
- changing rtas_error_log.buffer does seem to change some code
generation in arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/ras.o, I can't quite see
why.
Andrew
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
ajd@...ux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
Powered by blists - more mailing lists