[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62b81216-120b-40c0-bcf4-d3d3867200e0@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 17:35:43 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, corbet@....net,
keescook@...omium.org, tony.luck@...el.com, gpiccoli@...lia.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/18] soc: qcom: Add qcom's pstore minidump driver
support
On 03/05/2023 19:02, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> This driver was inspired from the fact pstore ram region should be
> fixed and boot firmware need to have awarness about this region,
> so that it will be persistent across boot. But, there are many
> QCOM SoC which does not support warm boot from hardware but they
> have minidump support from the software, and for them, there is
> no need of this pstore ram region to be fixed, but at the same
> time have interest in the pstore frontends. So, this driver
> get the dynamic reserved region from the ram and register the
> ramoops platform device.
>
> +---------+ +---------+ +--------+ +---------+
> | console | | pmsg | | ftrace | | dmesg |
> +---------+ +---------+ +--------+ +---------+
> | | | |
> | | | |
> +------------------------------------------+
> |
> \ /
> +----------------+
> (1) |pstore frontends|
> +----------------+
> |
> \ /
> +------------------- +
> (2) | pstore backend(ram)|
> +--------------------+
> |
> \ /
> +--------------------+
> (3) |qcom_pstore_minidump|
> +--------------------+
> |
> \ /
> +---------------+
> (4) | qcom_minidump |
> +---------------+
>
> This driver will route all the pstore front data to the stored
> in qcom pstore reserved region and the reason of showing an
> arrow from (3) to (4) as qcom_pstore_minidump driver will register
> all the available frontends region with qcom minidump driver
> in upcoming patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 11 +++
> drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pstore_minidump.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 128 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pstore_minidump.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
> index 15c931e..afdc634 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
> @@ -293,4 +293,15 @@ config QCOM_MINIDUMP
> these selective regions will be dumped instead of the entire DDR.
> This saves significant amount of time and/or storage space.
>
> +config QCOM_PSTORE_MINIDUMP
> + tristate "Pstore support for QCOM Minidump"
> + depends on ARCH_QCOM
> + depends on PSTORE_RAM
> + depends on QCOM_MINIDUMP
> + help
> + Enablement of this driver ensures that ramoops region can be anywhere
> + reserved in ram instead of being fixed address which needs boot firmware
> + awareness. So, this driver creates plaform device and registers available
> + frontend region with the Qualcomm's minidump driver.
> +
> endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile b/drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile
> index 1ebe081..02d30d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile
> @@ -34,3 +34,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_KRYO_L2_ACCESSORS) += kryo-l2-accessors.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_ICC_BWMON) += icc-bwmon.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_INLINE_CRYPTO_ENGINE) += ice.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_MINIDUMP) += qcom_minidump.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_PSTORE_MINIDUMP) += qcom_pstore_minidump.o
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pstore_minidump.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pstore_minidump.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8d58500
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pstore_minidump.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pstore_ram.h>
> +#include <soc/qcom/qcom_minidump.h>
> +
> +struct qcom_ramoops_config {
> + unsigned long record_size;
> + unsigned long console_size;
> + unsigned long ftrace_size;
> + unsigned long pmsg_size;
> + unsigned int mem_type;
> + unsigned int flags;
> + int max_reason;
> +};
> +
> +struct qcom_ramoops_dd {
> + struct ramoops_platform_data qcom_ramoops_pdata;
> + struct platform_device *ramoops_pdev;
> +};
> +
> +static struct qcom_ramoops_config default_ramoops_config = {
Cannot this be const?
> + .mem_type = 2,
> + .record_size = 0x0,
> + .console_size = 0x200000,
> + .ftrace_size = 0x0,
> + .pmsg_size = 0x0,
> +};
> +
> +static struct qcom_ramoops_dd *qcom_rdd;
Drop file scope variable. It's not even used.
> +static int qcom_ramoops_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device_node *of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + struct device_node *node;
> + const struct qcom_ramoops_config *cfg;
> + struct ramoops_platform_data *pdata;
> + struct reserved_mem *rmem;
> + long ret;
> +
> + node = of_parse_phandle(of_node, "memory-region", 0);
> + if (!node)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(node);
> + of_node_put(node);
> + if (!rmem) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to locate DT /reserved-memory resource\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + qcom_rdd = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*qcom_rdd), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!qcom_rdd)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + cfg = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> + if (!cfg) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get supported matched data\n");
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> + pdata = &qcom_rdd->qcom_ramoops_pdata;
> + pdata->mem_size = rmem->size;
> + pdata->mem_address = rmem->base;
> + pdata->mem_type = cfg->mem_type;
> + pdata->record_size = cfg->record_size;
> + pdata->console_size = cfg->console_size;
> + pdata->ftrace_size = cfg->ftrace_size;
> + pdata->pmsg_size = cfg->pmsg_size;
> + pdata->max_reason = KMSG_DUMP_PANIC;
> +
> + qcom_rdd->ramoops_pdev = platform_device_register_data(NULL, "ramoops", -1,
> + pdata, sizeof(*pdata));
> + if (IS_ERR(qcom_rdd->ramoops_pdev)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(qcom_rdd->ramoops_pdev);
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not create platform device: %ld\n", ret);
> + qcom_rdd->ramoops_pdev = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_ramoops_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
Use instead .remove_new callback.
> +{
> + platform_device_unregister(qcom_rdd->ramoops_pdev);
> + qcom_rdd->ramoops_pdev = NULL;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id qcom_ramoops_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-ramoops-minidump", .data = &default_ramoops_config },
You don't need this entry.
> + { .compatible = "qcom,ramoops-minidump", .data = &default_ramoops_config },
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_ramoops_of_match);
Blank line goes after the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE, not before.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists