linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH v2][next] scsi: lpfc: Use struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq1leh4froo.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 May 2023 11:26:49 -0400
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     Justin Tee <justin.tee@...adcom.com>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Justin Tee <justintee8345@...il.com>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
        Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][next] scsi: lpfc: Use struct_size() helper


Gustavo/Justin,

>> > We probably should have declared no_of_objects as __be32 to have
>> > avoided this confusion.
>>
>> Perhaps this patch can add that too?
>
> Yes, please.  Something like this is fine:

Please send a formal patch. Thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering